As a group we identified that within Leeds is a well known crime rate within student housing. Mostly within areas of Hyde Park and headingly, which is where the majority of 2nd and 3rd year students live.
What evidence did you find to support your decisions?
By asking students around the college premises we asked of they or someone they know(being a student) had been burgled whilst living in Leeds. We mostly asked 1st year students which looking back was a mistake as most burglaries happen within student housing which mostly concerns 2nd and 3rd year students, however from the people we asked most knew someone who had been burgled whilst being a student. This being evidence that it is a problem and is not a rare occurrence.
What methods did you use to gather your evidence and what forms did it take?
primary: questionnaires, surveys, photo documentation
Seconday: internet research, police data, percentages, safety campaigns security advice
Quantitative: close ended questionnaires/surveys, police date and percentages
Qualitative: Open ended questionnaie/surveys, photo documentation, safety ads and campaigns
What methods did you find useful and why?
The close ended questionnaires we conducted were very useful to simply establish our chosen problem was genuine without actually getting an hard facts or data.
Another would be internet sites which consisted of data, % etc on burglaries through the past couple of years within specific areas of Leeds, this being useful as we could use facts t back our given problem and create visual aids from them.
What methods did you find problematic?
I found just trying to illustrate and visualise the problem in such a way that could have been used as a safety precaution say within an awareness campaign, and also just to be a visual aid to prove and solve our stated problem.
How did you overcome this?
I took it upon myself to photograph my journey as a burglar, stealing from poor old students, which in the end gave me some visually interesting scenarios and ideas as to what could be possible. As a group we mainly focused on typography as a means of getting our evidence across, in the form of stats and percentages and also to make it aesthetically pleasing.
How will you address these issues in the future?
I guess i could use photo documentation as one of the first things i do within projects, 'visual aid production'.
What research didn't you carry out that would have proved useful?
I suppose carrying out further open ended questionnaires to 2nd and 3rd year students that had been burgled since living in leeds. Overall i think we got a set of 5 answers from students for this, but with more time etc it would have been helpful to have gathered more, simply to give us a range and try to find if there's a reason why students are getting burgled.
What five things would you do differently next time?
. Not go on holiday half way through the project
. Done more open ended questionnaires with students who had been burgled
. Use more imagery
. Ask a larger range of people for our surveys and questionnaires
. Take the photo documentation further
List five things you feel you have learned about the design process over the past two weeks?
. Not being there for half of a project doesn't help
. Learnt 3 colour codes off by heart
. The use of font. concerning opacity, size and colour
. Work makes me tired
. Group work is an effective means of producing more work in less time.